Insider Chatter by Donna Bogatin

December 26, 2007

Will Twitter Meet Digg’s Fate?

Fred Wilson seconds The Guradian’s Web picks for 2008. No surprise, of course, given that two of author Bobbie Johnson’s “hits” are Wilson funded companies, via his Union Square Ventures: Etsy and Twitter.

Wilson’s A VC blog is a promo fest for his portfoilio companies.

Wilson wants his A VC readers to buy a $30 oil spot vase, a $88 retro camera and a $500, 15 inch wire Harley-Davidson, all via his Etsy storefront.

Wilson wants his A VC readers to “Get a Voiki now!,” the latest animated product of his portfolio company, Oddcast.

Wilson wants all to “follow” him at Twitter.

A VC masterfully uses his “personal” blog to showcase his own USV portfolio companies. The A VC treatment, though, is not a guranteed win for funded companies. Wesabe, for example. Wilson on the runner-up Wesabe case:

Our portfolio company Wesabe was the first company to market in the web-based personal finance sector, which has gotten quite hot lately with the launch of competitors Mint and Geezeo. Wesabe’s taken a bit of a backseat on the visibility front in light of its competitor’s launches…

Wilson nevertheless is (publicly) upbeat: “This is a very big market opportunity and we think there is room for more than one large company in this category.”

But what about the “what are you doing category?,” aka Twitter? When Jaiku went to Google, the blogosphere was ablaze wondering “Why not Twitter?”

Why did Twitter miss out on Google acqusition love? How could a U.S. brand, adored by the tech blogosphere and founded by the founder of Google acquired Blogger be passed over for Finnish Jaiku?

We will most likely never know. We do know, however, that Twitter continues to frustrate its most ardent Tweeters. Dave Winer, for example. In September, he increduously annoited Twitter, a free consumer service, “mission critical.” 

I pointed out to Winer, however: Is it really prudent, though, for any professional or business to abdicate control over “misssion critical” operations to a new, unproven, consumer facing, free Web 2.0 tool that is offered on an “as is” basis to be used “at your own risk.”

The Twitter non-performance “guarantee”:

We reserve the right to modify or terminate the Twitter.com service for any reason, without notice at any time.

Winer has since had his fill of Twitter’s non-performance,” lamenting now: “What other basic form of communication goes down for 12 hours at a time?”

Winer is so perturbed that his no-cost “mission critical” Twitter is not performing up to his non-paid expectations that he has put out specs for the Twitter clone he would like produced:

It’s fairly amazing that there isn’t a viable Twitter clone out there yet, one that does exactly what Twitter oes, and runs all its applications. I’d also like to see something much more decentralized, based on static files, available to any Twitter-like system. It doesn’t seem that far out of reach. With all the scaling troubles Twitter has had it’s surprising that there haven’t yet been any entrepreneurs willing to enter the space to compete with Twitter.

Despite Winer’s belief that there are no Twitter-worthy alternatives already on the Web, Jaiku and Pownce are indeed deemed by many to be Twitter competitors.

Pownce is a Kevin Rose co-production. Pownce is not open to the public and Rose’s Digg is being buried alive by its once greatest booster: Michael Arrington’s TechCrunch.

What about Twitter? Will it also soon be deemed a has-been by the very crowd that put it on a pedestal?

Twitter is massively used by the tech blogosphere for self-promotion, same as Digg. The Twitter team includes a geek celebrity, same as Digg. Twitter is hard-pressed to realize its crossover dreams, same as Digg.

Are Twitter’s tech glory days numbered?

ALSO: Mint CEO on Web 2.0 Nonsense AND Who Needs Wesabe: INTERVIEW and Wesabe USV: YOUR Financial Data Belongs on the Web!

AND: Digg: TechCrunch Bails on Arrington Web 2.0 Fave and Twitter and Facebook: The BIG Illusions of Friendship and Influence and Mahalo: Will Calacanis Win the Billion Dollar Startup Lottery in 2008?

CONTACT DONNA BOGATIN

Filed under: General, Web 2.0 Start-Up, Web 2.0, Digg, Pownce, Twitter
Written by: Donna Bogatin @ 11:52 am

 

December 17, 2007

Digg: TechCrunch Bails on Arrington Web 2.0 Fave

NEWS FLASH: Kevin Rose is a Digg has been, pedaling a “used” Digg, but no takers!  

Michael TechCrunch Arrington began the year by piling on the Digg worship, he closes it though by bailing on the Web 2.0 turnkey startup that he famously warned would disintermediate the New York Times!

Arrington shared that he “couldn’t live without Digg” in January. He confided:

Anyone who reads this blog knows my position on Digg, where users pick what news makes it to the home page. It’s the future of news, and the most disruptive force to mainstream media since blogs were born. Digg has to continue to battle spam while pleasing its most active users, which won’t be easy. But I use the Digg site every day.

Digg battles spam? Like the 10 Digg accounts Arrington himself has fessed up to?

At the 2006 Future of Web Apps Summit, Arrington glowed that Digg was the Web 2.0 startup he would most like to be join the executive ranks of.

In March of 2006, Arrington signaled “the power of Digg” as a “significant social force.” In congratulating Digg on its 2nd birthday last December, Arrington consulted his crystal ball to announce: “Digg investors are going to make a boatload of money.”

Last summer, on the eve of the launch of Digg 3.0, Arrington declared “Digg is looking more and more like the newspaper of the Web and is challenging even the New York Times on page views.” I challenged Arrington on THAT comparison!

Last March, Arrington went to bat for the Kevin Rose phenomenon,” asserting “Wired Magazine seems hell bent on convincing the world that Digg is falling apart”:

My problem is Wired isn’t simply reporting news about Digg. They’re making the news. And they’re going negative. Wired isn’t just reporting Digg news - they are actively engaged in using Wired to undermine Digg.

Arrington’s handy chameleon Web personality, however, has been jumping on the “negative” Digg boat as well, though, as I chronicle in Who Needs Digg? We Got Twitter, Stumpleupon, Facebook…

Today’s who needs Digg TechCrunch post, penned by lieutenant Riley, takes the about face Digg cake: “For sale, used social voting site, asking price $300 million, goes by the name of Digg”:

If anybody has a spare $300 million and would like to buy Digg, Allen & Company’s contact details are here.

Arrington is “obsessive” about profiling Web 2.0 startups, but carefree in annointing Web 2.0 winners, even those he himself founds and puts money in. The Arrington track record is on a (bad) roll.

What TechCrunch effect? Edgeio, anyone? SEE: Edgeio Web 2.0 Bomb: Michael TechCrunch Arrington Cheers $5 million Startup Loss

ALSO: Gawker: Will Nick Denton PAY For Media Respectability? and Google Knol: The End of Google.com, NOT Wikipedia and Google Zeitgeist: $200 University Payola AdWords Scam and Google Warning: How GOOG 411 Tricks Consumers and Why Facebook Will NEVER Kill LinkedIn

CONTACT DONNA BOGATIN

Filed under: General, Web 2.0 Start-Up, Blogosphere, Blogs, Web 2.0, Digg, TechCrunch
Written by: Donna Bogatin @ 9:28 pm

 

November 24, 2007

Mixx: TechCrunch Gets Into the Mix, Big Time!

Michael TechCrunch Arrington scores a double holiday weekend “social news” coup: His dig at Digg in favor of Digg clone Mixx is the number one most popular item at Techmeme and…at the newly TechCrunch annointed Mixx!

On the heels of Arrington’s public plea to Digg founders Kevin Rose and Jay Adelson to just sell the (damn) Digg thing already, TechCrunch now pleas the case for “Digg refugees,” in favor of Mixx!

In Who Needs Digg? We Got Twitter, Stumpleupon, Facebook… I reminesce about how just one year ago Arrington was “obsessing” about Digg, warning the New York Times of the purported ascending power of the Web 2.0 “news” phenomenon and I discuss how he is nevertheless now increasingly lowering his expectations for Digg.

BUT, is Mixx really on the Digg replacement ascent , as TechCrunch headlines today (while still hedging Digg traffic bets)?

Arrington’s Mixx shout-out can only help such a Mixx predicted trajectory come to fruition. TechCrunch may even be giving Mixx thanks this weekend as Arrington’s nod to ”Digg refugees” looking for greener social news pastures via Mixx is the number one “most popular” feature at Mixx.

TechCrunch is far from a one-hit wonder at Mixx: TechCrunch claims 40% of the top ten Mixx honors this weekend! Has Arrington figured out the Mixx secret sauce already?

I asked last March when Digg reached its million user milestone, “What does the future of Digg portend if even perhaps its most ardent supporter fesses up to “spamming” what Kevin Rose calls a “digital media democracy”? After all, in congratulating Rose on its 1,000,000 touted registered Digger, Arrington took a bit of the credit himself for helping Digg reach the impressive number sooner, rather than later:

They’ve had a million accounts registered at the site (at least ten of which are mine).

TechCrunch undoubtedly now seeks to be as “helpful” to the news aggregator startup he recommends we keep an (anti-Digg) eye on…Mixx.

MORE: WSJ.com Beware: Digg Users Plot Paywall Hack

ALSO: Microsoft Office Gets BIG Sales Boost in Live Documents and MoveOn’s Facebook Crusade: eBay, IAC, CBS, NYTimes Get Beacon Privacy Pass

CONTACT DONNA BOGATIN

Filed under: Google, Digg, TechCrunch
Written by: Donna Bogatin @ 8:01 pm

 

November 14, 2007

WSJ.com Beware: Digg Users Plot Paywall Hack

Kevin Rose proudly commands his Digg troops to “Digg On,” now at Wall Street Journal, and they are trying their darndest to live up to their leader’s expectations!

Rose’s blog exhortation (dutifully ‘dugg’ with 968 ‘diggs’ and counting) to “view Wall Street Journal Online articles from Digg” is short, AND short on clarity. Nevertheless, his legion’s of faithful Diggers are stepping in, and stepping up, for Digg.

A Digg user wants to know “How can we create a bot to submit every WSJ article to Digg automatically? I want access!” A fellow Digger offers “Try Ruby or PHP.”

BUT, why must Rose’s Diggers seek to “hack” WSJ.com to get what they want, free? After all, Rose declares:

The WSJ Online is adding Digg buttons across the entire site, and you’ll now have full (free) access to the articles submitted to Digg. The Digg buttons have started appearing on WSJ.com articles tonight.

How is an average, non-WSJ paying subscriber, Digger to get access to the WSJ stories for Digging, though, if they are stubbornly behind the WSJ paywall? Does Rose and/or WSJ want the world to believe that the entire WSJ Online is now available free, via Digg, thanks to a convoluted paid subscriber Digger scheme?

Moreover, a good, popular chunk of the WSJ Online is already largely free, directly at WSJ.com, no thanks to Digg.

The “big” Digg announcement reads as more than it really is, i.e.; WSJ is the latest mainstream media publication to add Digg buttons in the hopes of gaining more ‘free’ traffic.

And the great Digg drive to “democratize” digital media powers on.

MORE ON DIGG: Who Needs Digg? We Got Twitter, Stumpleupon, Facebook…

ALSO EXCLUSIVE: NYTimes.com on TimesSelect End: ‘Too Early To Declare Victory,’ Ad-Tech Report

PLUS: Stepan Pachikov: EverNote Web 2.0 Perfect Mobile Storm To Hit in 2008, INTERVIEW

ALSO: Google: U.S. Taxpayers To Finance GOOG Riches

CONTACT DONNA BOGATIN

Filed under: Media, Digg
Written by: Donna Bogatin @ 9:11 am

 

November 8, 2007

Who Needs Digg? We Got Twitter, Stumpleupon, Facebook…

Yay Digg? Not really.

Just one year ago Michael TechCrunch Arrington was “obsessing” about Digg, warning the New York Times of the ascending power of the Web 2.0 “news” phenomenon. Now, he is calling on Kevin Rose and Jay Adelson to just sell the (damn) thing already!

Arrington started the year by proudly declaring his allegiance to Digg as one of the 15 Web 2.0 companies he “couldn’t live without”:

Anyone who reads this blog knows my position on Digg. It’s the future of news, and the most distruptive force to mainstream media since blogs were born.

TechCrunch Digg cheerleading seems to have since dissipated, however:

October 2007: “Are Editors Needed To Sort Through Digg Chaos?”
July 2007: “A Way To Improve Digg’s Data”
May 2007: “Digg Surrenders To Mob”
March 2007: “Towards a Better Digg” (i.e, reddit, clipmarks, blinklist…)

What a difference a year makes? 

In March of 2006, Arrington signaled “the power of Digg” as a “significant social force.” In congratulating Digg on its 2nd birthday last December, Arrington consulted his crystal ball to announce: “Digg investors are going to make a boatload of money.”

Last summer, on the eve of the launch of Digg 3.0, Arrington declared “Digg is looking more and more like the newspaper of the Web and is challenging even the New York Times on page views.” I challenged Arrington on THAT comparison!

Arrington now seems to have lowered his expectations for Digg, saying: “There is a real argument that Digg can be a mainstream news sorting service.”

YES, but STILL NOT the New York Times.

Arrington continues to root for Digg, nevertheless: “There is no good reason to sell Digg when it continues to grow like a weed.”

Team Digg, undoubetdly, see things differently, though. Monetization hurdles, rampant cloning and increasing competition from newer, (cooler?) link “sharing” alternatives–Twitter, Stumpleupon, Facebook–are but some of the reasons Digg may be ripe for the selling.

BUT, Digg does not appear to be ripe for the taking. Despite enjoying tech cover boy status same as YouTube’s Chad & Steve and Facebook’s Mark, the lofty valuations THOSE geek idols garnered do not seem to be in the cards for Digg’s Kevin Rose.

Buyers are NOT Digging Digg the way Rose and Adelson believe they ought to.

ALSO: CED Tech 2007: 30 Cool Startups, But NO Facebook Apps and Business Plans Help the Web 2.0 Kool-Aid Go Down

PLUS: YES! Facebook IS Scarier Than Google!and Sexist LinkedIn: Hillary Clinton and Gender Politics

CONTACT DONNA BOGATIN

Filed under: Web 2.0 Start-Up, Digg, Venture Capital, VC, Entrepreneurs
Written by: Donna Bogatin @ 1:53 pm

 

September 20, 2007

Google Bookmarks Yahoo, Facebook, Digg

Web 2.0 sharing is caring and Google wants in: Google Shared Stuff.

WHAT IS THE GOOGLE SHARE/EMAIL BUTTON? Google asks and answers:

Allows you to easily share or email any web-page with your friends. Your shared stuff page is publicly visible and allows you to share stuff with your friends and on the web. Whenever you see the Google sharing button, on our sites or any other, click it to share the current webpage in whatever way you prefer! You can add the button to your bookmarks for frequent use.

gs292007.jpggs292007.jpg

The widget offers three main ways to share content with your friends and family.

You can add the item to your Google Shared Stuff page,
You can email the page, with a custom message,
You can post the page to some related social bookmarking sites.

gs92007.JPG

Google is showing itself to be the most benevolent sharer of all! it is sharing the sharing power of already leading social Web sharing tools, by showing its own Google’s sharers “more ways to share” via Facebook, Furl, del.icio.us, Social Poster, Reddit, Digg.

Google undoubtedly is seeking a little reciprocal sharing love from the Web’s reigning sharing stars.

ALSO: Zillow Gains VC and Google SEO Goodness and NYC Braces for Subway Cell Phone Rage: 5 million Yakkers Daily

CONTACT DONNA BOGATIN

Filed under: Google, Facebook, Social Media, Social Networks, Web 2.0, Yahoo, Digg
Written by: Donna Bogatin @ 1:04 pm

 

Powered by WordPress | Copyright Donna Bogatin | Contact Donna