Insider Chatter by Donna Bogatin

December 17, 2007

Gawker: Will Nick Denton PAY For Media Respectability?

ot121707.JPGAll of a sudden Nick Denton wants a seat at the media table, instead of scrounging for table scraps?

Did Gawker Media chief Nick Denton heed my recent blogging warning about the sustainability of a media model relying on the regurgitating of the oriiginal journalism of others?

During the Q & A of the IAB MIXX panel in September, “Users vs. Journalists vs. Advertisers: Does Web 2.0 Destroy or Enhance the Marketing-Media Ecosystem?” I asked Denton and his fellow panelists if mainstream media would eventually reject the link economy and therby unravel the not so virtuous, online copyright infringing Web conent ecosystem.

After all, shouldn’t old fashioned cold cash, aka licensing fees, be the end game for news organizations that DO put their own money on the line to pay for the real “news” that bloggers of all genres, shapes and sizes end up piggybacking off of and selling ads against for their own accounts?

At the end of the Web 2.0 day, will the shaky economic foundations of the derivitave blogosphere implode, I asked Denton and the New York Time’s About.com’s, Scott Meyer.

Speaking from his New York Times experience, Scott Meyer responded that mainstream media is OK with the (not so) quid pro quo, echoing a familar refrain that it is all about Google PageRank link love building. Denton, proud implementer of the VIA link at Gizmodo, did not have an opportunity to respond during the panel Q & A, but acknowledged to me that the “question” is a good one.

Such a good question, in fact, that Denton is now heeding my warning of a low-value, link-o-rama based blog fest: “It’s no longer enough to take stories from The New York Times, and add a dash of snark. Gawker needs to break and develop more stories,” a Gawker job listing stated, according to the New York Times.

The Times: “That dash of snark — the hallmark of Gawker since it was introduced in 2002 — is less valuable in a Web clogged with Gawker clones. Mr. Denton was apparently not impressed by any of the initial job applicants; within days he had decided to name himself managing editor.”

Not impressed? Denton perfectionism, or Denton slave driving??? If Gawker Media REALLY wants to compete with The New York Times, it will have to step up to the PAY plate! Real journalism does not come easily, or cheaply, as this professional blogger has long been originally reporting and analysing. SEE:

Does Huffington Post Exploit Bloggers AND Mainstream Media? and
If ‘We the Media’ Poaches Content, Who Pays for News Production? and
AP Sues VeriSign: News Aggregation ‘Business Model’ at Risk and
Tom Curley AP Crusade: Google AdSense Lawsuit Near? Thanks to Attributor and
Nielsen, Digimarc, Attributor: Free Internet Content Ride Is OVER!

New York Magazine recently turned the snark tables on Denton, billed “the attractive, upper-class gay Jewish Briton who owns almost all of Gawker Media,” in the expose: “Gawker and the rage of the underclass.” Author Vanessa Girgoriadis:

Like most journalists, I tend to have a defeatist attitude about Gawker, dismissing it as the Mystery Science Theater 3000 of journalism, or accepting its vague put-downs under the principle that any press is good press. After all, there aren’t lots of other news outlets that cover the minutiae of our lives, and we’re all happy for any smidge of attention and desperate for its pickups of our stories, which are increasingly essential to getting our work read. The prospect and high probability of revenge makes one think twice about retaliation. Plus, only pansies get upset about Gawker, and no real journalist considers himself a pansy. But there is a cost to this way of thinking, a cost that can be as high as getting mocked on your wedding day.

The cost of such a way of writing to Denton, though, is apparently very low:

Pinched nerves, carpal tunnel, swollen feet—it’s all part of the dastardly job, which at the top level can involve editing one post every fifteen minutes for nine hours a day, scanning 500 Websites via RSS for news every half-hour, and on “off-hours” keeping up with the news to prepare for tomorrow.

In the media world, publishers often get what they pay for, or don’t. Denton’s Valleywag, for big example. SEE:

Valleywag Breakdown: Drunken Imagination and Valleywag: Lots of Ham, Where’s the Beef?

What is Valleywag “Managing Editor’ Owen Thomas managing? NOT verifiable truths in “reporting” on actual, tragic events.

“A drunk employee kills all of the Websites you care about,” Thomas headlined in the heat of the Summer in good Digg-bait fashion, without caring to backup the accusation with reliable sourcing. A “tipster” was “credited,” as usual, but who knows, Thomas may even be “tipping” himself.

In his (not so) hard-hitting investigative series on the ripple effects of San Francicso power outages, Thomas also headlined “Angry mob gathers outside SF datacenter,” with photographic “proof”: eight mild mannered techies in casual business attire chatting on their cells while queing up patiently to enter an office building.

Thomas proudly takes his lack of credibility on the chin, literally, and even promises more! But, why shouldn’t he, with equally unprofessional new competitor Henry Blodget and his Kevin Ryan financed (not so) Silicon Alley Insider eagerly reguritating every bit of non-verified “SCOOP” that Valleywag poops out. SEE:

Henry Blodget Slams eBay’s Whitman: Yahoo’s Yang Next? and Henry Blodget 2.0: Silicon Alley Outsider Trolls Again and Blodget & Ryan: Cool, or Suck? WHAT Silicon Alley ‘Insider’!

Valleywag’s Thomas earlier this month: “I was duped on a Scoop. This isn’t the first rumor I got wrong. It won’t be the last one. All I can promise is that when I hear something, you’ll hear about it.”

YAY? Public inivtation for manipulation! Before Denton gets all media noble, he ought to get his existing journalism ducks in order.

PLUS: Google Knol: The End of Google.com, NOT Wikipedia and Google Zeitgeist: $200 University Payola AdWords Scam and Why Facebook Will NEVER Kill LinkedIn

ALSO: Reid Hoffman: LinkedIn About Face (book) and Digg: TechCrunch Bails on Arrington Web 2.0 Fave

CONTACT DONNA BOGATIN

Filed under: General, Offline Media, Old Media, Publishing, Blogosphere, Blogs, Newspapers
Written by: Donna Bogatin @ 5:16 pm

 

November 2, 2007

Associated Press: Smart, or NOT, with Google, Yahoo Deals

t11207.gifNo one escaped the new media indignation unleashed by Tom Curley, Associated Press CEO, at a dinner this week hosted by the Columbia School of Journalism. No one, except Rupert Murdoch, that is.

From Sam Zell to beat reporters, Curley lamented the current fashion to villify “dead tree media.” In a wide ranging speech debating the disrupted news economy, the ultimate irony for Curley is that while the news is (still) hot, the news business is not. Curley challenged “the news industry” to follow the right “fork in the road”:

We must take bold, decisive steps to secure the audiences and funding to support journalism’s essential role in both our economy and democracy.

Here ye, here ye? Curley applauded Murdoch for “stepping up,” but took particular aim at “the portals”:

The portals are runing off with our best stuff, and we’re afraid or unable to make or enforce deals that drive fair value.

 

Nevertheless, Curley countered his own damn the portals talk with the very self-depreceating commentary he lambasted his news industry peers for!:

Our institutional arrogance has done more to harm us that any portal.

So what’s the AP deal, literally, with Google and Yahoo? Curley plays the good cop, bad cop:

Great content always has needed great distribution. These days that means deals have to be done with portals, bu the deals have to be good deals. Most news organizations did deals years ago for promotion. The deals are one-sided. Job one for industry leaders should be doing whatever it takes to get a fair deal.

AP hosted by Google? Fair deal, or not? AP distributed by Yahoo? Smart deal, or not?

Curley teases: “We hope to strike some attractive new distribution deals with valuable advertising support.”

Will AP brought to you by Google and Yahoo soon be deemed (UN)attractive then?

READ MORE: What Google News? AP: Google Plays Second Fiddle to Yahoo and AP Sues VeriSign: News Aggregation ‘Business Model’ at Risk

PLUS: CNN Declares Google Dependence, BUT Reuters Independence and  Facebook on the Defensive: Friendster Fate Looms?

ALSO: Google Internet Fortress vs. Web 2.0 Cocktail Banter and Ad-Tech: BuzzLogic Latest to Push Google AdSense

CONTACT DONNA BOGATIN

Filed under: Offline Media, Google, Old Media, Media, Yahoo, Newspapers
Written by: Donna Bogatin @ 11:52 am

 

September 19, 2007

Google, Yahoo CAN’T Crack Local Ad Sales Code

Yahoo and Google sure have deep pockets when they want to make big acqusition splashes in their high-priority target markets. When it comes to local, however, they get cold feet about financing real feet on the street to realize their local visions where it really matters: On the ground.

Google came up with a sub-minimum wage pitch for Google fans to pitch in and pitch local merchants, on Google’s behalf: The $10 Google Local Business Referrals Program.

Yahoo has abdicated local prospecting by partnering with vendors in the field and is above all keen on the easy to reach local accounts of large national franchises.

Warren Kay, Director of Strategiic Alliances, Yahoo Search Marketing, addressed the Kelsey Directory Driven Commerce Conference in Reston, VA, Peter Krasilovsky reports:

We don’t have the structure or the appetite to field a local sales force.

While Kay apparently sought to present a down to earth take on the challenges of exploiting the local opportunity at Yahoo, his home-spun turns of phrases do not serve to position the Yahoo local effort in the strongest manner.

National verticals are important to Yahoo, but not doable at the local level due to limited resources for local sales, Kay indicated. Vertical sales orientation is optimal, but most sales organizations are organized geographically, according to Kay:

There isn’t enough of a vertical concentration in geograpic areas. With a vertical focus, you spend too much time behind the windshield and not enough time in front of customers. Verticalization is nice, but if you are delivering compelling ROI, it may not be as important to talk in their language.

Nevertheless, Kay assures SME and local is the future, especially for Yahoo:

We don’t have a permanent seat at the adults table, but we are no longer at the kiddies’ table.

What Yahoo and Google still don’t get, though, is that they are still playing around at local. Kay and his Google peers continue to rationalize about the poor economics of direct local ad sales, so the online local opportunity continues to be wide open, as they shy from meaningful reach out to local merchants.

Online local advertising scale is difficult to come by efficiently, as the efforts of both Yahoo and Google demonstrate. Meanwhile, traditional player Verizon’s online Superpages is widening its footprint by absorbing existing online assets: localsearch.com, switchboard.com…

How will the local space shakeout online? A new market disruptor will hopefully emerge, soon.

SEE: How Pegasus News Fuels Local Media Business Model for Fisher Communications: INTERVIEW and
Google’s $10 Local Search Pipe Dream: Slave Wages to Squeeze Yellow Pages

ALSO: Mint.com: Can Arrington and Calacanis Really Set Web 2.0 Trends?

CONTACT DONNA BOGATIN

Filed under: General, Advertising, Online Advertising, Offline Media, Web 2.0, Local, Local Advertising, Yellow Pages
Written by: Donna Bogatin @ 7:02 pm

 

September 14, 2007

Yahoo Buys BuzzTracker: Google News an ALSO RAN!

b91407.jpgLatest buzz: BuzzTracker goes to Yahoo News, and so does its founder, Alan Warms.

Yahoo News? What Yahoo News! Google News is the most newsworthy, even though Yahoo News is number one!

Yahoo boasts its 35 million readers per month represent “about 15 times the circulation of the largest newspaper in the U.S., USA Today.”

If Google News was not part of Google, it would undoubtedly be tagged with the dreaded new bloggers anti-buzzword–”also ran,” i.e., any company in a given sector that has not been graced number one in the blogosphere’s world view of things. Boasting a Googley logo, however, Google News is cheered and feared, despite lagging Yahoo in traction, big time.

In the onlline news game, it is Google that is the big, bad ALSO RAN, to Yahoo News!

When Google News finally showed its news destination ambition true colors–i.e., “Google begins hosting news on its site, AP news stories”–it was the talk of the online town, even though Yahoo News has long been featuring AP material.

Today, Yahoo News is making its own news: The acquisiition of BuzzTracker. Not really buzz worthy, apparently though. Buzz Tracker does not seem to be judged to merit (self-interested?) blogger kudos as the ruling Techmeme does.

Blogger ennui re BuzzTracker, and Yahoo:

Kara Swisher: “Yahoo had looked at other better-known competitors…trendier and more popular startups”

Michael Arrington: “Yahoo Makes Tiny Acquisiition: It is odd that Yahoo didn’t make a run for TechMeme, the heavyweight in the automated news tracking niche. BuzzTracker has mostly been known for leaving spammy comments on blog posts that talk about Techmeme or Technorati to get a little extra traffic.”

Matthew Ingram: “It sems like a distant also-ran…I check Techmeme religiously because it is by far the best…Why did Yahoo buy BuzzTracker..It’s possible that Yahoo isn;t all that bright, and just picked the first meme-tracker with a cute name, or figured that $5 million is about what Terry Semel blows on the coprorate jet every year, so what the heck.”

Sorry Matthew, NOT quite the $33 billion market cap Yahoo rationale, as Scott Moore explains:

Does this signal a radical shift for how we’ll run Yahoo! News? No. BuzzTracker technology will help improve the breadth and relevancy of our content — regardless of the source. But with Alan on board, we’ll bring organization to the thousands of conversations happening across the Internet and help users better sift through the news to find what they care about most.

YAHOO!

ALSO: CNET Rains on Yahoo and TechCrunch 40 Parades

CONTACT DONNA BOGATIN

Filed under: Offline Media, Google, Old Media, Media, Yahoo, Newspapers
Written by: Donna Bogatin @ 1:41 pm

 

September 2, 2007

What Google News? AP: Google Plays Second Fiddle to Yahoo

The rumors of the death of newspapers, thanks to Google, have been greatly exaggerated, again. 

Have Google and the wires really “torpedoed” newspapers? If so, Google is late to the news submarine party, as the Associated Press reports itself, at Yahoo:

Yahoo Inc., along with other major Web sites such as Microsoft Corp.’s MSN and Time Warner Inc.’s AOL, have been featuring AP material for years.

ap8207.JPG 

What’s more:

Despite Google’s dominance in search, its news section lags behind several other rivals. In July, Google News attracted 9.6 million visitors compared with Yahoo News’ industry-leading audience of 33.8 million, according to comScore Media Metrix.

Google is NOT the root of newspapers problems, newspapers’ ill-advised dependency upon Google is, as I discuss in CNN Declares Google Dependence, BUT Reuters Independence.

MORE GOOGLE NEWS ANALYSIS: Buzz Kill: What Would Google Do? DON’T ASK! and  GOOGLE MEDIA: One-Stop News Empire for Stories, Videos AND Letters to the Google Editor 

PLUS: Google GPay SMS Payments Patent? GCash ALREADY Alive and Well and Google Phone? Six Fun Eric Schmidt Facts About GPhone

CONTACT DONNA BOGATIN

 

September 1, 2007

GOOGLE MEDIA: One-Stop News Empire for Stories, Videos AND Letters to the Google Editor

YAY! “Original stories, from the source,” Google News announces. 

While the blogosphere gleefully mocked Sam Zell when he had the gall to burst a “Google News is a publishers best friend” over inflated balloon, I countered: Google News is NOT Newspaper Driven.

Who is mocking whom now? Google continues to taunt the news media, big time, proving over and over that Google ONLY wants what is best for Google shareholders, despite a crowd-pleasing win-win-win spiel.

In the heat of the summer, Google Media has been putting the heat on news publishers, by declaring Google to be THE direct, one-stop media destination for:

1) Hosted, original reader commentary at destination Google Media in response to news stories published by third party media organizations,

2) Hosted, original news videos at at destination Google Media created by third party media organizations,

3) Hosted, Original wire news reports at destination Google Media created by third party media organizations…

Will the blogosphere AND new media continue to be duped by Google Media smoke and mirrors?

Google News IS a ruse, I said just two weeks ago, when the L.A. Times was skewered Sam Zell style for also having the gall to question the motivations of allmighty Google.

SEE Google News is a Joke: LA Times is NOT Laughing and Does USC Annenberg OJR Want Old Media Journalists to Shut Up? 

The Google mission is indeed alive and well: Obtain, control AND monetize ALL the world’s information, for the good of the world, Google’s world that is.

ALSO: Buzz Kill: What Would Google Do? DON’T ASK! and What Google News? AP: Google Plays Second Fiddle to Yahoo

PLUS: Quechup Spam Hysteria? Beware Facebook Risky Email Business

CONTACT DONNA BOGATIN

Filed under: Video, Google, YouTube, Old Media, Publishing, Media, Newspapers
Written by: Donna Bogatin @ 1:18 pm

 

Powered by WordPress | Copyright Donna Bogatin | Contact Donna