Hey, Microsoft: Send CMP Media the HealthVault Memo (c/o Web 2.0 Summit)
When my fellow panelist at last week’s Council for Entrepreneurial Development Tech 2007 conference in Research Triangle, Eric Auchard, Reuters, warned the audience, “don’t believe everything you read in the media,” I got a chuckle from the same audience when I pointed out, “but Eric, you ARE the media!”
Eric may be on to something, though, if big media player CMP Media’s Information Week report today direct from the Web 2.0 Summit in San Francisco is any indication!
Richard Martin, for Information Week, on the Google-Microsoft “race to bring the resources of the Internet to personalized health care”:
Microsoft has not publicly disclosed its plans for a health-related product, but is said to be working on an offering that combines software with an online component.
“We’re building a broad consumer health platform,” Steve Shihadeh, general manager of Microsoft’s health solutions group, told The New York Times in August.
BUT, what did MICROSOFT TELL THE WORLD on October 4, 2007, i.e, what did it “disclose” while LAUNCHING IT’S ‘HEALTH-RELATED PRODUCT,’ Microsoft HealthVault?
Hey, Richard, read all about it, here at Insider Chatter: HealthVault: Microsoft to Beat Google Medical Search Thanks to MOM!
What makes CMP (major) Media’s glaring reporting inadequacy all the more inexcusable is that the Web 2.0 Summit that CMP staffer Martin ought to be providing the definitive word on is actually PRODUCED BY CMP MEDIA, in conjunction with O’Reilly Media, AND SPONSORED BY MICROSOFT, to boot!
What’s more, Tim O’Reilly, himself, was most concerned this morning over the chutzpah of Michael Arrington to “scoop” him at his own conference, run (and the plot thickens) in partnership with O’Reilly’s Web 2.0 Summit partner, who is ALSO Arrington’s TechCrunch ad network vendor, John Battelle, aka Federated Media!
AND, on Tuesday, Web 2.0 O’Reilly mused out loud about the entire (non?) meaning of Arrington’s Web 2.0 TechCrunch!:
TechCrunch is the #1 site on the Techmeme leaderboard, yet most of what it covers will be forgotten not merely in years but in months, and have proven to be completely unimportant: the froth of me-too company creation around ideas and trends that as yet are quite immature and poorly understood. (Michael Arrington himself told me that most of the companies he’s covered since starting Techcrunch “have just faded away”.)
Web 2.0 coverage that TechCrunch dedicates itself to is “completely unimportant” in the words of the Web 2.0 meme creator himself, O’Reilly? AND, O’Reilly concurrs with Arrington that the hundreds of companies TechCrunch champions “just fade away”?
PLUS, Web 2.0 is but “immature froth” comprised of “me-too” companies that are “poorly misunderstood”, in the words of Tim Web 2.0 O’Reilly? HAS TIM BEEN READING INSIDER CHATTER???
BUT, isn’t the O’Reilly-Battelle Web 2.0 team supposed to make sure Web 2.0 IS understood???
If Web 2.0 O’Reilly is correct about Web 2.0 Arrington, though, why then did 100 startups pour their hearts, souls and (travel) money into the TechCrunch40 demo pit???
ANYWAY, Google’s medical push is now under the auspices of Marissa Mayer (the new and improved Google Health Architect?) and she is undoubtedly reminding her Googley troops (90 minutes a day) of that old Avis slogan: We’re number two so “WE TRY HARDER!”
YAY! And the Web 2.0 world turns, under the banners of CMP Media, O’Reilly Media, Federated Media, TechCrunch Network….
SEE: CED Tech 2007: 30 Cool Startups, But NO Facebook Apps
PLUS: BREAKING: Commtouch CEO on Spam MP3 Files Attack (Britney Spears NOT So Friendly) and Google Q3 Planetary Gains: Every Country AND The Cloud