Insider Chatter by Donna Bogatin

What information overload in the Facebook presidential debates? After all, Facebook users “have shared their political affiliations and opinions since the site’s inception,” the (don’t call it social networking) site boasts:

Facebook first began adding politicians to the site during the 2006 mid-term election. Today, more than 500 US politicians have Facebook Pages, where Facebook users can support candidates, learn more about them and communicate with them. These include all the major presidential candidates, most Members of Congress and many state governors. In November 2007, Facebook launched a partnership with ABC News for the 2008 presidential election – including a revamped US Politics application on Facebook and co-sponsorship of the televised debates ahead of the New Hampshire primary.

Who needs Google then? What CNN-YouTube debates? What have you done for me lately, rather! YouTube is playing the New Hamsphire priimary card with its standard “submit Your Voter Video” solicitation:

Anyone who is in New Hampshire and thinking (a la Facebook Soundboard) about the primaries can submit a video. You don’t have to be a New Hampshire voter necessarily, thought we are looking to highlight videos from the Granite Staters. Document your primary experience from start to finish. We want t shoe the natio what primaries are like, so bring your video camera along with you and give an on-the-ground view of your experience.

Facebook may be neck and neck with YouTube on the online-offline social networking political game, but in the high-stakes political power battlefield that really counts, Google is the hands down winner.

Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, John McCain…have all made their pilgramages to the mighty Googleplex for what Google CEO Eric Schmidt is fond of calling ”the ultimate job interview for the top job in the U.S.” The top Googler has made sure that “the presidential campaign trail winds though the Googleplex.”

Circa 2007:

Google CEO Eric Schmidt to Hillary Clinton: Welcome to Google!

Senator Hillary Clinton: I am thrilled to be at the “best place to work in America” that is “helping to invent the future” and has “revolutionized the way we live, work, think…”

So began a one on one in February between the leader of one of the most powerful corporations in the world and the (then) Democratic frontrunner in the race to become the next leader of the most powerful country in the world. The Clinton chat with Schmidt before an audience of Googlers took place after Clinton privately meet at the Googleplex with Silicon Valley leaders.

Schmidt’s Q & A with the former First Lady offered presidential candidate Clinton an opportunity to present her stands on major election issues, such as Iraq, the environment…AND Google Health!

Schmidt set-up to Clinton:

These are the people that make Google a success. You are a Google user. How can Google help your vision happen?

Clinton return:

When Eric was showing me around, we stopped at the Google Health team office, we can not get to Universal Health Care coverage unless we have a much better information base that is very reliable that people can turn to make decisions on their own, to be empowered as consumers of health care, that is something I know you are working on and we really need you to be aggressively pursuing that.

We do need more Information Technology generally in health care, if you’ve gone to a new doctor, they probably took a new history on paper, they probably don’t have electronic medical records, if you go to a doctor out of state, they’ll have to do it all over again, because they probably can’t transfer what you have at your doctor.

The health sector is woefully deficient in Information Technology, any way you can help us move our health sector into the 21st century will help us to get a base of information on which we can make better decisions to provide health care for everybody.

Sound familiar? Ex-Googler Adam Bosworth’s ears may be ringing! His December 2006 “Connecting Americans to Their Health Care: Empowered Consumers, Personal Health Records and Emerging Technologies” speech seems to have “inspired” Clinton.

Bosworth is long gone from Google and Google’s health care intiatives seem to be going nowhere, but the leader of the leading Amerian corporation still has the ready ear of the next president of the United States, whomever that may be.

Google also is making political hay daily not only in our nation’s capital, but alongside governments worldwide. Worried about Google’s determination to control the world’s information? The Google triumvarite aims to rule the entire world Googley style, really.

Facebook’s wet behind the ears Mark Zuckerberg, though, is most likely NOT prepping to meet and greet the world’s power elite.

SEE: Google Global Power Grab: Aussie Politicians in Tow and
Google to World: AdWords Need Political Freedom and
PayPerPost Warns U.S. Congress of Google Monopoly: Barack Obama to the Rescue? and
Eric Schmidt: Google Cures What Ails the World and
The Next President of the U.S. Answers to Google and
Google Masters Art of Influence Peddling and
Google Joins Blogosphere in Mocking Wikia Search: Jimmy Wales Defiant

CONTACT DONNA BOGATIN

The New York Times says consumers will soon be wielding “torches and pitchforks” against cellphone carriers. Is a “rebellion” also in store for Linkedin?

At LinkedIn, Ms. Hillary Clinton is “the man,” despite being “First Lady” and seeking to be the first FEMALE president of the United States. As sexism is defined as “behavior, conditions, or attitudes that foster stereotypes of social roles based on sex” (Merriam-Webster), LinkedIn’s professional “profiles” are sexist, big time.

LinkedIn prides itself on its advertiser-friendly “premium audience,” claiming executives from each and every Fortune 500 as members. Founder Reid Hoffman proudly “signs” his LinkedIn communications by underscoring the “fact” that “3,414 CEOs use LinkedIn every day.”

How does LinkedIn’s president of products, and team, visually represent each and every one of the 15 million professionals it cites as members, both men and women? WITH A GLASS-CEILING STEREOTYPE REINFORCING MINI-MAN.

For example, the professional experience of Hillary Clinton, the most powerful woman in the world, is depicted on her LinkedIn Profile by a suit-and-tie sporting male icon. Ditto for one of LinkedIn’s own powerful women, Kay Luo, head of communications, AND every other one of the female members of LinkedIn.

Last month I discussed Facebook vs. LinkedIn: Who has the Women? noting that, while updating my LinkedIn profile over the weekend, I was taken aback to see that after posting information on my “experience,” a little executive LinkedIn MAN icon now is part of my profile, NOT a little executive LinkedIn WOMAN! (same as LinkedIn’s Ms. Luo’s profile below)

I spent some time on LinkedIn this past weekend as well and, while reading the profile of a prominent female CEO, was struck once more by the absurdity of LinkedIn using exectuive men to depict all of the executive women using its site.

I wrote in October:

It may be a “little” thing, but it is representative of that old boys club notion of the inner executive MALE circle. Why does LinkedIn “decorate” all of the 14 million plus professional profiles it hosts with executive mascots representing professional men, regardless of the gender of the person the profile represents? It would be simple to use a unisex icon, rather than a definitatively male one.

Or, how about applying a male or female executive icon as gender appropriate to individual profiles. Hey, LinkedIn could really take a stand against the purported executive “glass ceiling” by making its mascot icons universally FEMALE!

Linkedin subsequently informed me they “noticed my blog mention about the executive male mascots on LinkedIn and are trying to work with design teams to change that to unisex, if feasible.”

Six weeks later, men still rule the executive LinkedIn profile ranks, even while LinkedIn touts it has recruited “Google’s Lloyd Taylor as VP of Technical Opertations to scale infrastructure and systems and Yahoo’s Anil Khatri as VP of Engineering” to accelerate innovation.

Clinton (Hillary) has vowed to “shatter the highest glass ceiling” by becoming the first female president of the United States. Her gender-based political pitch rings somewhat hollow, though, as she is pitching her candidacy at Linkedin under the guise of a male executive.

Clinton says it is “time the world adjusted” to powerful women leaders. It is also time LinkedIn adjusted its mascots to its women members.

ALSO: Salesconx Will Monetize Your Rolodex: LinkedIn Beware? INTERVIEW

PLUS: MerchantCircle CEO Aims To Disrupt Local Advertising $39 billion Spend: INTERVIEW and Google Sends Microsoft $10 million Press Release: Bye, Bye Windows Mobile!

CONTACT DONNA BOGATIN

Insider Chatter presidential campaign 2008 special series on what I am calling “User Generated Politics”

The Next President of the U.S. Answers to Google

And, THE User Generated Politics debate question of last evening’s YouTube CNN democratic candidates debate: Chris Nolan, a democratic operative from illinois, queried abut the unseemlyness of having a Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton U.S. presidential dynasty.

I have been asking the same thing; The U.S. is not Britan, after all!

Nwe York Senator Hillary Clinton, former first lady to president Bill Clinton and frontrunner to become the next president of the United States proudly declared at ther campaign Website in May: “Governor Spitzer, thousands turn out to support campaign.”

Pictures say a thousand words! Looking closely at the photograph below, Hillary has literally replaced Bill in pressing the flesh of the adoring throngs (only missing piece, of course, a Lewinsky style nod).

Below the showcase shot of Hillary in action for campaign 2008 at the campaign’s Website was a duet of photos: portraits of Hillary and Bill side by side, or rather, portraits of President Clinton and former First Lady, Senator Clinton.

Surreal or only in America? Clinton is firmly behind Clinton; HE is looking forward to returning to the White House, at HER side.

IS Hillary concerned that she is the new Bill? NO, the right man for THIS job is a woman, Hillary Rodham proclaimed last evening, via YouTube.

SEE The Next President of the U.S. Answers to Google

CONTACT DONNA BOGATIN

Insider Chatter presidential campaign 2008 special series on what I am calling “User Generated Politics”

The winner of the YouTube fueled democratic debate last evening? GOOGLE! 

Sergey Brin has proudly underscored to Wall Street that there is no obvious ceiling to Google monetization. There is obviously no ceiling to Google’s ambition for power, as well.

Who is helping “choose” the next president of the United States? Google, and Google’s YouTube.

Google funded last May’s Personal Democracy Forum (PDF) “Technology is Changing Politics” conference in New York City, a masterful Google PR cum Political Business Development stroke, undoubtedly had by Google for a very reasonable price, CEO Eric Schmidt keynote honors included.

Google not only operates as if it is the “gateway to the Internet,” it aims to be the virtual Universe. Schmidt asserted at the PDF forum:

I don’t know that the Internet is more important than health care, but it almost is,” people need access to the (Google) Internet, for access to the modern world.

(Unfortunately, however, Google is NOT helping the world gain access to the Internet, despite its bravado about “open” broadband platforms; SEE Africa NOT Online: Will ‘Open’ Google ‘Put Up or Shut Up’?)

Speaking of health care, Schmidt spoke in depth about it at the Googleplex earlier in the year, Google’s version of it that is, in a tete a tete with the presidential front runner, Hillary Clinton. The result? Between Schmidt’s charm and Googlers’ money, Hillary for President is also Hillary for Google branded Personal Health Records.

(SEE Google, Hillary Clinton and U.S. Health Care)

Google is determined, in fact, to not only control all the world’s information, but to make sure “the presidential campaign trail winds though the Googleplex” as well. 

The Google top brass, led by Googler in Chief Eric Schmidt, is enjoying the political fruits of intimate sit-downs with all who hope to become the next president of the United States, AND the not so humble, but very merry, band of Googlers are having their say, and their way, with the candidates, as they dutifully pay homage to the most powerful Internet company, and gateway sponsor of presidential debates.

Schmidt is fond of calling the Mountain View meet and greets part of the ultimate job interview for the top job in the U.S.

Google is succeeding in requiring the next president of the United States personally answer to Googlers, and to Google’s YouTubers.

ALSO: Google Masters Art of Influence Peddling and User Generated Politics Slams U.S. Royal Dynasties

CONTACT DONNA BOGATIN

The blogosphere is outraged SICKO: Over the WRONG Google Health issue.

While Google warns health care industry beware Michael Moore, U.S. health care consumers themselves ought to be wary Google, Google Health that is, under the direction of Google Health architect, Adam Bosworth.

YES, the Google Health Advertising Blog is pushing Google AdWords to medical advertisers as an antidote to Michael Moore’s critique. BUT, contrary to conventional widsom, Google is not acting as a disinterested media company cum ad agency cum PR consultancy AND Google was not innocently blind sided by a wet behind the ears mid-level staffer.

The Google Health Advertising blogger, Lauren Turner, who is indicated as having penned the original “Does negative press make you Sicko,” took the fall for Google in a subsequent not quite retraction post.

Did Google OK the original post, or not? Regardless, the supposed correction does not materially differ from the original incendiary “indictment” against Moore’s indictment.

Michael Arrington is convinced though that Google, the corporation, did not have a hand in Turner’s first power to the health care industry post. What’s more, he claims to know how Google, the corporation, really feels about the health care industry, Michael Moore and Sicko:

There is no way anyone who’s blogged or worked in PR for more than, say, a week would post something like that on a corporate blog. Millions of Americans have a serious problem with the way health care is handled in this country, and such a polarized topic is hardly one in which a company like Google wants to take a stand. And if they did take a stand, it would be with Moore.

REALLY? Google only takes public policy stands which benefit Google, the corporation:

Workers’ rights? The right for Google to employ foreign rocket scientists at will.

Censorship? The right for Google to sell AdWords unimpeded around the world.

Health Care? The right for Google to house the personal electonic medical records of U.S. residents.

AND, Google IS taking a Health care stand, big time, politically and multi-billion dollar business wise.

Google CEO Eric Schmidt personally welcomed presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton to the Googleplex in February. Clinton made her presidential case before an audience of Googlers, after she met privately with the inner circle of top Googlers.

The Schmidt led Q & A offered presidential candidate Clinton an opportunity to present her stands on major election issues, such as Iraq, the environment…

Schmidt concluded the chat by offering Senator Clinton an opportunity to also present her stands on major issues of concern to Google, such as Google’s medical push.

Schmidt set-up to Clinton:

These are the people that make Google a success. You are a Google user. How can Google help your vision happen?

Clinton return volley:

When Eric was showing me around, we stopped at the Google Health team office, we can not get to Universal Health Care coverage unless we have a much better information base that is very reliable that people can turn to make decisions on their own, to be empowered as consumers of health care, that is something I know you are working on and we really need you to be aggressively pursuing that.

We do need more Information Technology generally in health care, if you’ve gone to a new doctor, they probably took a new history on paper, they probably don’t have electronic medical records, if you go to a doctor out of state, they’ll have to do it all over again, because they probably can’t transfer what you have at your doctor.

The health sector is woefully deficient in Information Technology, any way you can help us move our health sector into the 21st century will help us to get a base of information on which we can make better decisions to provide health care for everybody.

Sound familiar to the December 2006 “Connecting Americans to Their Health Care: Empowered Consumers, Personal Health Records and Emerging Technologies” speech of Google Vice President Adam Bosworth, head of the Google Health team? INTIMATELY!

What’s more, Bosworth has been on a cross-country “sponsored (financed) by Google” road show evangelizing a Google ten year medical plan for the United States!

In Google Health: Lambast Doctors, Sell Medical Ads, I present and analyze what Google aims to do about what it claims is a sad state of U.S. health affairs.

Google is on a big medical mission, and it is attacking on all (opposing) cylinders: 1) Consumer Health Care Advocacy AND 2) Corporate Health Care Advertising Sales.

What is the ultimate Google end-game? Nothing short of becoming the one-stop, defacto, go-to destination and repository for ALL the personal, private medical information of ALL the nation’s residents, as a start.

PLUS, sell all the world’s health care advertising.

CONTACT DONNA BOGATIN

 Special “User Generated Politics” Coverage of Presidential Campaign 2008, by InsiderChatter.com 

Google YouTube makes for a powerful one-two political punch in presidential campaign 2008.

First, Google makes sure the “presidential campaign trail winds though the Googleplex.”  Now, YouTube is hosting its very own presidential debate, in conjunction with CNN!

Google is determined to control all the world’s information and has its eyes currently set on the powerful political kind. Not only is the Google top brass, led by Googler in Chief Eric Schmidt, enjoying the fruits of intimate sit-downs with all who hope to become the next president of the United States, the not so humble, but very merry, band of Googlers are having their say, and their way, with the candidates, as they dutifully make their pilgramages to the Goolgeplex.

First Hillary Clinton, then John McCain, Bill Richardson…Schmidt is fond of calling the meet and greets part of the ultimate job interview for the top job in the U.S. and, as Richardson can attest to, an interview at Google is no walk in the park, even with a Mountain View!  

When Schmidt welcomed Clinton in February to his “house” with the requisite courtesy, the frontrunner candidate reciprocated with a rousing endorsement of Google Vice President Adam Bosworth’s ambitions for Google branded Personal Health Records.

McCain and Richardson did not have such smooth Googley sailing, however.

Googlers in attendance were visceral in their interrogations of McCain and Richardson and Elliot Schrage, VP, Global Communications and Public Affairs, was a more direct host, in for Schmidt to represent the $150 billion market cap corporation before presidential candidate Richardson.

McCain of course can tell a story or two about what is to be under interrogative fire and following his Googleplex experience he can add a few more tales to his repertoire. Many Googlers put forth what they believed would be best for McCain to do if he became President. McCain apparently got the message.

In response to a Googler question about immigration laws, McCain got his biggest round of applause of his “job interview” at Google:

If Google is going to be able to maintain its supremacy in the world, it is going to have to continue to get the best and the brightest from all over the world, and I accept with your gigantic egos, that you are the best…we need an H1B visa program that works.

Richardson was apparently double teamed: Host Schrage and Googlers let Richardson know how they REALLY feel. 

Schrage is not a disinterested party, in more ways than one. He is the point man for the Google effort to grab the biggest chunk it can of the $80 million that is projected to be spent online during campaign 2008.

Google’s reception of Richardson, according to the San Jose Mercury News:

Richardson didn’t know his audience very well. After he promised to give companies such as Google tax incentives to install solar panels, the audience roared - in laughter. Google already does that, without any tax incentive, one employee noted.

In one awkward moment, Richardson told the audience “I’m Hispanic; the Richardson name doesn’t help.” He looked around the audience, and said, “You have no Hispanics here.” Elliot Schrage, vice president for global communication who was interviewing Richardson, replied, “Of course we do.”

Is it really an honor to be honored with an invitation to the Googleplex?

Fifty lucky YouTubers will soon be honored when a televised Democratic debate scheduled for July 23 will feature questions for the candidates derived from “citizens,” their snack-sized videos that is. 

CNN Washington bureau chief David Bohrman will produce the broadcast and has these words of advice to  political YouTubers seeking to submit video questions for the presidential candidates:

Be concise, no more than 30 seconds, provocative, and creative. But, NOT “obscene” or “inappropriate.”

Despite CNN censoring for “appropriateness” in a political debate for the most powerful position in the world, Bohrman is confident the network will get “some very inventive questions.”

CONTACT DONNA BOGATIN